Quantcast
Channel: National Association to Stop Guardian Abuse
Viewing all 12001 articles
Browse latest View live

Son fleeces elderly parents: Mom left in nursing home, dad at funeral home

$
0
0
Ryan Powers
FORT MYERS, Fla. — Janet and William Powers bought a house in the Florida city where their son was living so that when they could no longer live independently, they could move into a mother-in-law suite at the home. There, they could live out their final years — cared for and surrounded by family.

The couple signed a durable power of attorney giving their son, Ryan Todd Powers, access to their finances. When Ryan sold their home in Alva, Fla., the $72,000 was supposed to be used for remodeling the Lehigh Acres, Fla., home and for his parents' income and care.

Documents filed with the Lee County (Fla.) Circuit Court tell a different story. According to the records, the younger Powers spent the money and his mother's Social Security to buy pizza, rent movies and pay for his cellphone. He left his parents in nursing homes refusing to pay the bills. And when William Powers died, the son wouldn’t pay the funeral home. William Powers' body went unclaimed for 90 days. Finally, Lee County picked up the remains and Powers was cremated at taxpayer expense.

In September, a jury found Ryan Powers, 41, guilty on four counts of first-degree exploitation involving an elderly person. He faces up to 60 years in prison. On Monday, two years to the day that he opened a fraudulent checking account in his mother's name and began his scheme to defraud, Powers was sentenced to 20 years in state prison.

Power of attorney


Ryan was Janet and William's only living child. Janet thought William coddled him too much. She questioned the wisdom of buying a home for Ryan, his wife, Brandy, and their children to live in, she told Earl Rutland, a law enforcement investigator in the Attorney General's Medicaid Fraud Control Unit. But she went along with her husband's plan.

The couple, both in their early 70s, paid an attorney to draft a Durable Power of Attorney giving Ryan control over their financial and legal affairs. Two months later, Ryan redirected Janet Powers' $808 monthly benefit checks from the couple's joint checking account to the one in his and his mother's names. Over the next 10 months, Ryan used a debit card 136 times to tap the account for cash and to pay for purchases at places such as convenience stores and a pawn shop.

In early 2016, William Powers told Ryan to sell the couple's trailer in Alva and use the proceeds to remodel the Lehigh house, still in the elder Powers' names, so they could move out of the nursing homes and live together.

William was in a nursing home in North Fort Myers, Fla., more than 100 miles away from his wife, who had been moved to a nursing home in St. Petersburg. It was the nearest one that agreed to take a patient on Medicaid, the government program that pays for health care for people who have little or no money.

In order to qualify Janet for Medicaid, the nursing home needed financial information. Ryan wouldn't supply it but did give the nursing home bank statements that appeared fraudulent, prompting a call to the state Department of Children and Families Adult Protective Services.

To catch a thief


Janet Powers told the Department of Children and Families investigator she believed her son was stealing her money.

Ryan told another investigator he only used the bank account to pay his mother's bills. He had sold the trailer, he said, for $60,000 and it had a mortgage of $50,000 and he had to pay taxes on the sale.
The investigation by Rutland, the agent with the Attorney General's office, showed the home sold for $72,000. Most of the money, minus $6,000 in cash given to Ryan, was deposited into William and Janet's bank account. The buyers paid the trailer park fees and taxes.

Wells Fargo's anti-fraud program wouldn't let Ryan access the money until the buyers' check cleared. Four days later, he withdrew $50,000 from his parents' joint account, putting the money on a cashiers check. He went back to the bank several times, cashing the check, getting cash, and then getting another cashier's check for the difference.

William Powers told Rutland he didn't know what happened to the money from the sale of the trailer.
He wanted to be with his wife. He wanted to revoke his son's power of attorney.

A week later, on July 5, 2016, William Powers died. The nursing home had been paid for July and because William had died on the fifth, Ryan was looking for the refund. He needed it to pay the funeral expenses, he told the business manager at the nursing home. The manager, "did not believe he would do so," Rutland wrote in his affidavit. "She tried to persuade him to let her pay the funeral home, but he refused."

Ryan picked up the $3,722.50 refund check from the nursing home and cashed it at a check cashing store. The funeral home was never paid and the county cremated William Powers.

In late November 2016, Ryan filed a handwritten quit claim deed to take ownership of the Lehigh Acres house, which was in his parents' names. His mother didn't sign the deed and his father was dead. Ryan Powers signed for both as the power of attorney.

The younger Powers was arrested in December and charged with exploitation of the elderly. He was released the next day, but in January was arrested again for grand theft for continuing to use the power of attorney to sell his parents' truck.

During the trial, Ryan testified he was acting at the behest of his father. His dad had told him not to pay his mother's nursing home bills, to sell the Alva home and to transfer ownership of the Lehigh Acre house, he said.

The jury didn't buy it. And on Sept. 1, after a four-day trial, Ryan Todd Powers was convicted of four counts of exploitation of the elderly.

Common crime


Financial exploitation of the elderly is not unusual. That the perpetrator of the crime was a relative isn't either. What makes this case unusual is that the victim came forward and law enforcement pursued it.

"Those are the two highest hurdles to get over," said David Kessler, a certified fraud investigator who trains law enforcement to investigate crimes against the elderly. "Tracking the money and dealing with the perpetrator," is the easy part, he said. The difficulty comes in getting victims to implicate their loved ones and getting law enforcement to recognize this as a crime and not a civil or "family matter."

The crimes leave the victims not only destitute but traumatized. "It goes far deeper than monetary value, the (perpetrator) has raped those people emotionally. He's stolen their dignity."

"The only good thing about (the Powers) story," Kessler said, "is the elderly gentleman wasn't alive to realize his son didn't care about him even in death."

Powers' mother did not speak at Monday'shearing. Assistant State Attorney Jennifer Royal read the statement Janet Powers wrote.

"You dumped us both in separate nursing homes, so we could not even see each other and spend our last days together," Janet Powers' statement read. "You abandoned us like last week's trash."
As Royal read, Powers began to quietly cry. With his hands handcuffed and chained to a shackle around his waist, he used a tissue to wipe the tears from his eyes.

Powers had taken their cellphones so she and her husband, whom she called "Rusty," couldn't even talk to each other, Janet Powers wrote in her victim statement.  She didn't have money to buy clothes and wore hand-me-downs from people in the nursing home who had passed away.

"I find some comfort that we will be serving time together," the statement read. "You in your prison and I in mine."

Full Article & Source:
Son fleeces elderly parents: Mom left in nursing home, dad at funeral home

Ex-lawyer in Charleroi admits defrauding elderly woman, used money to run Mon Valley newspaper

$
0
0
Keith Allen Bassi, a former lawyer, admitted Monday morning that he stole half a million dollars from an elderly lady with dementia and used some of it to run the newspaper, the Mon Valley Independent.

Mr. Bassi, 61, of Charleroi, pleaded guilty in federal court to mail fraud counts in ripping off a woman identified as "N.J.L," who is 85 and living in a Mt. Lebanon care home.

Prosecutors said he pilfered about $505,000 from her accounts and put the money in his own accounts, including that of the paper he co-owns.

"It's certainly despicable," said the woman's 75-year-old cousin, who is seeking to become her legal guardian and watched the proceedings before U.S. District Judge Arthur Schwab.

He asked that he and she not be named publicly until guardianship is granted.

Mr. Bassi was charged Sept. 25 after an investigation by the FBI and U.S. postal inspectors.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Greg Melucci said he gained power of attorney over her estate, which could be worth some $3 million, in 2006. The woman, a former Pittsburgh public schools principal, was diagnosed with dementia in 2012.

It was then that Mr. Bassi began maneuvering to transfer money out of her accounts and into his.

Mr. Melucci said he misappropriated the funds between 2013 and 2016.

As part of the scheme, he used her money to a $55,000 annual premium on a life insurance policy between 2013 and 2015, then asked for a "surrender request" for the policy in 2016 and deposited the amount, about $163,000, into his personal account.

Mr. Bassi also deposited $110,000 of N.J.L.'s money into the publishing company account at CFS Bank.

Mr. Melucci said federal agents, who learned of the fraud by monitoring suspicious banking transactions, confronted Mr. Bassi in May. He admitted to the crime and said he did it because of "financial issues."

Mr. Bassi's law license has been suspended. He remains free on bond pending sentencing March 14.

He said nothing in court except to answer Judge Schwab's questions about his guilt. The exact amount of money he stole is in some dispute and will be worked out before the sentencing.

"Mr. Bassi has agreed to pay full restitution," said his lawyer, Stephen Stallings.

He declined further comment as he left the courthouse with his client.

The victim's cousin, a former teacher and attorney, contacted the U.S. attorney's office and Judge Schwab after reading about the fraud in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette last week.

In a letter to them, he said he suspects Mr. Bassi may have stolen more than the $505,000 for which he was charged. He said he and other family members had received a letter from Mr. Bassi after N.J.L. had moved to the nursing home in 2015 indicating that he was auctioning off the personal property that she had kept at the family farm in Washington County.

The cousin said no one has seen those proceeds.

Among her collections, he said, was China worth some $100,000, figurines valued at $2,000 each and family memorabilia. The house, which was sold in 2012, dates to the 1780s.

"I'd just like to know what the hell happened to the other stuff," her cousin said. 

Full Article & Source:
Ex-lawyer in Charleroi admits defrauding elderly woman, used money to run Mon Valley newspaper

Ayudando allegedly stole client’s $117,000, housed him in leaky trailer

$
0
0
Justin Bowers - (Colleen Heild/Albuquerque Journal)
LAS VEGAS, N.M. – For Justin Bowers, home is a travel trailer that attracts flies and leaks when it rains. Even so, it’s a step up from where his court-appointed guardian previously had him living – in a 17-man boarding home that charged $800-a-month rent.

It’s not what Bowers, who is from Albuquerque, wants. It’s not what his father, who worked 30 years for the U.S. Post Office, wanted for his son.

Bowers, 34, who has been under state-approved guardianship since 2012, inherited $117,000 when his father died in 2014 – enough money for a better life and, perhaps, more independence.

But in the hands of the now-defunct Ayudando Guardians Inc., Bowers said his trust funds have vanished.

“I just want my money back,” he said last week. “I need that money to get out of this place.”

Bowers, described as mentally disabled but highly functioning, is considered an incapacitated person under state law. Since Chief District Judge Nan Nash of Albuquerque appointed Ayudando as his guardian, Bowers has been placed at two different boarding homes in Las Vegas. According to Bowers’ mother, Ayudando officials said there was nowhere in Albuquerque to house him.

His current residence is a hail-damaged trailer – for which he pays $700 a month. It is part of a boarding home complex outside the city limits of Las Vegas.

Bowers gets one hot meal a day plus a grocery allotment – which this month consisted of oatmeal, a bag of sugar and 24 frozen waffles. He relies on a space heater to keep warm. Bowers was happy the man living in the back of trailer moved out some months back.

Initially, Ayudando paid Bowers’ living expenses from his Social Security benefits. His guardianship services were paid for by the state Office of Guardianship, because he was deemed indigent.

But after receiving his father’s life insurance proceeds in 2014, Bowers couldn’t understand why he was still living in a meager boarding home. Why Ayudando told him “no” when he pleaded for money for food and clothes. Why he could never get a straight answer as to how much insurance money he had left.

Now he thinks he knows. Ayudando president Susan Harris and chief financial officer Sharon Moore, according to a federal indictment issued in July, are alleged to have siphoned at least $4 million from client accounts to support a lavish lifestyle for themselves and their families. That’s in addition to their six-figure annual salaries.

The 13-year-old company, one of the state’s largest guardianship agencies, had about 1,400 clients statewide, 176 of whom were under court-appointed guardianships or conservatorships authorized by the state District Court in Albuquerque. Ayudando catered to military veterans and vulnerable disabled clients in need of someone to manage their affairs or their finances.

Before the U.S. Marshals office closed Ayudando offices in Albuquerque in late August, Bowers said he spoke with a company bookkeeper. All he had left was $500 in Social Security benefits.

“When we found out that all his money’s gone, it was like, ‘What?’ ” said his mother, Dawna Gomez, of Albuquerque. “… He always used to tell them, ‘You guys act like it’s your own money.’ ”

A $117,000 inheritance

Judge Nash, who appointed Ayudando as Bowers’ guardian, is expected to approve a new guardian for him on Monday.

It’s unclear when Bowers’ inheritance vanished.

The U.S. Marshals office hasn’t responded to Journal questions. Court records in guardianship cases are sealed by law.

But the public court docket sheet, listing the filings in the case, shows Nash received regular annual reports from Ayudando, as required by state law.

No actual bank statements or bond were required from the company.

Bowers said he never received copies of Ayudando’s reports to the court but now wonders whether false financial information was provided. He recalls that, sometime back, Sharon Moore told him he had about $87,000 remaining in his trust.

Moore’s attorney couldn’t be reached for comment last week.

In 2013, the docket sheet shows, Nash was asked to remove Ayudando as Bowers’ guardian. Two years later, a motion was filed to review the guardianship. But Ayudando remained Bowers’ court-appointed guardian.

Under the judicial code of conduct rules, Nash isn’t permitted to talk about pending cases. Bowers’ guardian ad litem, Elizabeth Honce, would not comment for this story.

But Bower’s mother recalled that Ayudando initially drew up documents to put the $117,000 inheritance in a trust so that if Bowers died, all remaining proceeds would revert to Ayudando.

“The judge found that unacceptable,” Gomez recalled, and new trust documents were created.

Another issue arose after her son got a part-time night job cleaning the Las Vegas offices of the New Mexico State Police earlier this year.

His paychecks went to Ayudando, which gave him only $50 a month, Bowers told the Journal.

Bowers said he informed Nash he wasn’t getting his entire $260 monthly paycheck, and the practice stopped.

His paychecks and $998 Social Security benefits pay for his $700-a-month rent on the trailer, gasoline, car insurance and cellphone.

Gomez recalled that during a June 21 hearing, Nash said she was considering appointing a conservator to manage Bowers’ funds.

At the time, an Albuquerque trust company, Desert State Life Management, had made headlines after state financial regulators discovered $4 million in missing client funds.

Ayudando’s Sharon Moore was in court that day as Bowers’ guardian.

“The judge told her, ‘I want somebody to look over your shoulder,’ ” Gomez recalled last week. But no conservator was appointed at that time, the docket sheet shows.

After the hearing, Gomez recalled, Moore came up “and put her arm around me, even though we never got along. She said, ‘You don’t have to worry about Justin’s money. It’s safe.’ ”

This is the travel trailer, part of a private boarding home complex in
Las Vegas, N.M., where the now-defunct Ayudando Guardians placed
Justin Bowers. (Colleen Heild/Albuquerque Journal)

A month later, Moore and Harris were arrested on a 28-count federal indictment that charges them with conspiracy, mail fraud and money laundering. They pleaded not guilty and were released from federal custody pending trial by putting up their Tanoan Country Club-area homes as security.

“I’m upset and frustrated,” Bowers said. “They (allegedly) ripped people off, and Sharon is out there living free in her expensive house. She ain’t living in no dump.”

Enhanced oversight?

Since the federal indictment, state District Court in Albuquerque is now requiring bonds from conservators managing $30,000 or more. The New Mexico Supreme Court is considering recommendations to enhance oversight, including requiring bank statements of conservators.

But no lawyer has come forward to try to recoup funds on behalf of Ayudando’s former clients. Some say there is little left to recover, because client funds were allegedly spent mostly on entertainment and vacations rather than on assets, such as property.

In the case of Desert State, in which no criminal charges have been filed, the U.S. Attorney’s Office filed a petition for forfeiture of a Texas cattle ranch, an Angel Fire vacation home and a Downtown Albuquerque office building owned by former CEO Paul Donisthorpe. Several attorneys representing former clients have filed lawsuits against Desert State seeking to recover their missing money.

So far, in the Ayudando case, only Harris’ 2018 recreational vehicle has been seized by the federal government.

In federal court, a judge can order restitution to victims after a criminal case ends. No trial date has been set for Harris and Moore.

‘A better life’

Halbert Bowers died at the age of 62, after retiring from the U.S. Postal Service in Albuquerque in 2011.

Justin was his only child.

“He was a dad who was very much involved with his son’s development and activities,” stated his obituary notice from the Young Funeral Home, in Yemassee, S.C.

Ayudando didn’t permit Justin to attend the funeral in South Carolina, he told the Journal.

Gomez said her son has a knack for remembering numbers, dates and names, and attended special education programs.

Until 2012, he lived with his mother, who remarried in 1995 after she and Bowers’ father divorced.

Gomez said she petitioned the court to place her son into a guardianship after “he got out of control.”

Police arrested him several times on charges that included trespassing and harassment. The cases were dismissed after he was found to be “incompetent” to stand trial. A police crisis intervention officer suggested a guardianship.

Since Bowers was placed under a guardianship, court records show he has had no subsequent arrests.

Gomez said her son had “anger issues” but is now stable and administers his own medication. He drives to work in a 2001 Lincoln Town Car that Ayudando allowed him to purchase for $5,000.

Bowers found the car himself online. But, under Nash’s order, he can’t drive outside of Las Vegas.

When he isn’t working, he says, he watches television in the trailer and on Sundays attends church.

More than anything, Bowers wants to move into his own apartment.

“I just want to get my own place and to keep working where I’m at,” Bowers said. Maybe he can find another part-time job in the morning, such as delivering newspapers or working as a dishwasher, he told the Journal. He hopes his luck will change.

“They said I was supposed to have a better life,” he said.”But how am I supposed to have a better life if they stole my money?”

Full Article & Source:
Ayudando allegedly stole client’s $117,000, housed him in leaky trailer

How the state steals seniors' rights and calls it 'compassion'

$
0
0

We like to think that America is a nation of rights, of equal treatment under the law, a nation that respects the dignity of every individual citizen, regardless of race, color, or creed. Our Constitution and Bill of Rights enshrined these attitudes into law, and we venerate them and tell ourselves that ours is a noble and compassionate country.

Yet there are certain classes of people who effectively have no rights. They are deemed, by virtue of who they are, not to warrant the same autonomy the rest of us enjoy. Some of these are children, whose age disqualifies them from exercising the same rights as adults. I’ve written extensively about the plight of those diagnosed mentally ill and how they are subject to the most horrific abuses with little or no recourse. A third class of persons, forced to live at the mercy of the state, consists of the nation’s elderly.

The New Yorker recently ran an exposé on the practice of legal guardianship, and the findings are shocking. Most people are probably aware that it is possible to commit elderly dementia patients with doctors’ recommendations and court orders, but few understand how broad these powers actually are.

A holdover from British law that regards the state as the “parent” of its citizens provides a legal route to rob individuals of their rights, with little trace of anything resembling due process. Court-appointed guardians can force the elderly to leave their homes, relocate to assisted-living facilities, and relinquish control of their assets without ever notifying them or their next of kin. The imposition of guardianship is sudden and confusing, leaving the victims little chance to obtain adequate legal representation to defend their rights.

Once the guardians get their hands on their wards’ finances, they can exploit those resources for their own gain and charge family members hefty fees just for visiting or calling their elderly relatives. The process is not unlike that of a kidnapper extracting ransom money from desperate families.

There is no medical legitimacy to guardianship, as the wards need not have been diagnosed with dementia or any other brain disease that would render them incapable of acting autonomously.

Instead, the decision to rob people of their rights rests solely on a judgment call made by the courts, where the situation is decidedly one-sided. When a professional used to manipulating the legal system goes up against a scared retiree who has never set foot in court before, it’s no surprise which one usually comes out on top.

The ostensible purpose of the state is to protect the vulnerable from those who would abuse them. In this case, however, as in so many others, the exact opposite is true. Men and women are being stripped of their autonomy for no reason other than their age and their inability to defend themselves, and their assets being handed over to opportunistic predators — all aided and abetted by the courts under the ironic guise of compassion.

People don’t stop being people when they get older. The Constitution doesn’t suddenly stop applying to them. We need to stop pretending that efforts to control and manipulate the population are motivated by anything other than malice, cruelty, and greed. You simply can’t help people by turning them into wards of the state.

Full Article & Source:
How the state steals seniors' rights and calls it 'compassion'

Contra Costa County judge accused again of misconduct

$
0
0
A veteran Contra Costa County judge with an extensive record of discipline was accused by the state Commission on Judicial Performance on Tuesday of further misconduct in two criminal cases.But a lawyer for Superior Court Judge Bruce Mills accused the commission of a conflict of interest because the defendant Mills sentenced in one of the cases has publicly accused the commission of covering up judicial misconduct. The defendant, Joseph Sweeney, who heads an organization called Court Reform LLC, has been among the most prominent voices in a campaign that has led the state auditor to begin a probe of the commission’s operations.

“I think it’s outrageous that the commission, with a clear conflict of interest, would bring charges against Judge Mills rather than referring the matter ... to an independent body,” said the attorney, James A. Murphy. “If a judge did what the Commission on Judicial Performance did, the judge would be subject to discipline.”The commission’s executive director, Victoria Henley, declined to comment.

Mills, 62, a former prosecutor,was appointed to the bench by Gov. Pete Wilson in 1995 and has been elected by county voters to a succession of six-year terms, most recently in 2014.

The commission privately reprimanded him in 2001 for ignoring a defendant’s request for a lawyer and trying to coerce the defendant to plead guilty. It publicly reprimanded him again in 2006 for making “discourteous” and “demeaning” comments to people appearing in his court. Mills was reprimanded again in 2013 for contacting a juvenile court judge who was hearing a case against Mills’ son.

In one of the new allegations, the commission said Mills sentenced Sweeney, who had been found in contempt of court by another judge in a family law case, to 25 days in jail in August 2016 but told him and his lawyer he could get the sentence cut in half for good behavior. But Mills imposed the sentence without half-time credits, told the sheriff’s office not to reduce Sweeney’s term, and relented only when Sweeney’s lawyer contacted him nine days later, the commission said.

In the second case, the commission said, while a jury in Mills’ court was deliberating drunken-driving charges in March 2016, the judge met privately with the prosecutor, talked about his own experience prosecuting such cases, and mentioned data that might be used to help the prosecution.

The jury deadlocked, but Mills did not remove himself from the case until the district attorney’s office disclosed the private conversation, the commission said.

Murphy, the judge’s lawyer, said the charges of misconduct in both cases were unfounded.

“Bruce Mills has had a bull’s-eye on his back with the Commission on Judicial Performance,” Murphy said. “They’ve been after him for years and years for petty things.”

Full Article & Source:
Contra Costa County judge accused again of misconduct

WXYZ appealing order from Metro Detroit judge in First Amendment battle

$
0
0
PONTIAC, Mich. (WXYZ) - It’s the story several lawyers did not want you to see: The 7 Investigators are looking into allegations of problems in the probate guardianship system.
Last week, a judge stepped in and issued a restraining order, preventing Channel 7 from showing any pictures or videos of two of the people at the center of the story, Janet and Milan Kapp.

On Tuesday that judge said he’s standing by that decision.  So now WXYZ is heading to the Court of Appeals.

Mila Kapusta and several other local families asked the 7 Investigators to make their stories public.  Those who asked us to investigate say they’ve lost control of their loved ones to court-appointed guardians.

Many of these cases end up in probate court because of family disputes, and the Kapp family fight prompted these two sisters to try to stop the 7 Investigators from using pictures of their parents in our investigation.

Just hours before the story was supposed to air last Thursday, Lorrie and Sandy Kapp got a judge to issue a Temporary Restraining Order, preventing us from showing you old family pictures that had been provided to us by their other sister, Mila.

Tuesday during a show cause hearing, Judge Daniel A. O’Brien continued that restraining order, saying his job was to protect Mr. and Mrs. Kapp, who are now in their 90s.

“I am granting the injunction against Channel 7 and they are restrained.  It is in fact a prior restraint I gotta admit, but they are not to use any photos or video of Milan and Janet Kapp in any broadcast,” said Judge O’Brien.

WXYZ’s attorney Jim Stewart argued that Judge O’Brien’s initial restraining order was unconstitutional.

“A court cannot order someone not to publish something.  It’s called a prior restraint of speech and it’s been held to be presumptively unconstitutional,” said Stewart.

Legal experts say “prior restraint” is typically only used in cases where there is a threat to national security.

Clearly there is no such threat in this story, and this is now about much more than just pictures.
“You can’t have the government telling somebody what they can and can’t say when they’re covering a newsworthy event,” said Stewart.

Because WXYZ cannot allow Judge O’Brien’s order to set a precedent for other government officials limiting our news coverage – as protected by the First Amendment – we are appealing his order.

Full Article & Source:
WXYZ appealing order from Metro Detroit judge in First Amendment battle

Cop Rescues 92-Year-Old Man Turned Away at Bank Because His ID Had Expired

$
0
0
A Los Angeles County policeman went far beyond the call of duty while responding to a report of an elderly man having a fit inside a bank.

Montebello Police Department Officer Robert Josett was answering a public disturbance call when he was faced with a 92-year-old man who was upset because tellers wouldn’t give him his money.

The senior citizen’s California identification card had expired, and Bank of America’s policy requires that a valid government-issued ID be shown when making withdrawals.

So Josett comforted the white-haired gentleman by gently suggesting they take a ride over to the Department of Motor Vehicles and get him a brand new card.

And so they did.

With a little encouragement from the cop, DMV workers quickly renewed the man’s identification. And Josett brought him back to the bank, where he was able to get his hands on his money, just before closing time.

The department posted a photo of the officer leading the man, who leaned on a cane, into the DMV office.

The image has been viewed more than 257,000 times, and shared more than 39,000 times. It has also garnered more than 19,000 comments.

“Heart touching and I love that the officer was able to get him in and out of the DMV so quickly!" Sharon Watkins wrote. "That is medal worthy."

“With everything that is going on in our nation, this shall bring a smile to us all,” Mia Flores posted.

Full Article & Source:
Cop Rescues 92-Year-Old Man Turned Away at Bank Because His ID Had Expired

Lansing lawyer who was removed from cases pleads the Fifth during hearing

$
0
0
Catherine Jacobs
LANSING -- A Lansing lawyer who has been removed from several cases by judges in two counties asserted her Fifth Amendment rights repeatedly Tuesday when questioned about the circumstances surrounding the finances of a man for whom she was power of attorney and from whom she stands to inherit a reported $1.5 million.

Catherine Jacobs, a lawyer with Loomis Law Firm, refused to answer questions from lawyer Douglas A. Mielock during a hearing in Ingham County Probate Court regarding the conservatorship of Paul Hansen.

At the end of the hearing, Judge Richard Garcia appointed attorney Pat Gallagher as conservator for Hansen’s finances and revoked Jacobs’ power of attorney.

“There is some question in my mind regarding the gentleman’s capacity to issue that power of attorney,” Garcia told Jacobs’ lawyer, Philip Dwyer. “More importantly, I don’t believe your client is suitable to be a conservator.”

The hearing is the latest in a volley of motions, petitions and denials tied to Jacobs’ removal from several guardianship and conservator cases over the summer.

Between June and August, Garcia removed Jacobs from her roles as guardian and conservator in several cases and requested an investigation into Jacobs by the Attorney Grievance Commission.

The removals followed court hearings in which Garcia discovered that Jacobs had signed off on a major surgery even though her guardianship for that patient had lapsed; that she had an undisclosed agreement with Sparrow Hospital in which she was paid to petition for the guardianship of certain patients; and that Jacobs’ granddaughter and her granddaughter’s boyfriend were living in the home of a woman with memory impairments for whom Jacobs is guardian and conservator.

In August, Jacobs filed the first of at least four motions to disqualify Garcia from her cases, largely because of the judge's request to the Attorney Grievance Commission.

Garcia has denied Jacobs' requests each time, including one she filed in Hansen’s case.

On Tuesday in Clinton County, Probate Judge Lisa Sullivan weighed in on one of the cases in which Garcia denied Jacobs’ motion for disqualification. Sullivan, who was asked by the State Court Administrative Office to review the case, supported Garcia’s denial of the motion. Sullivan indicated she expects to hear similar motions in other cases.

Mielock attended the Hansen hearing Tuesday as a representative of Crisann Breed, the daughter of Ester Breed, one of three people named in Hansen’s will. Ester Breed, a cousin to Hansen, died Oct. 12.

According to an Ingham County Sheriff’s Office report, Jacobs and her daughter, Mona Darling, were longtime friends of Hansen and, at some point, Darling became Hansen’s power of attorney.

In 2015, the Ingham County Sheriff’s Office began investigating withdrawals Darling had made from some of Hansen’s accounts and Jacobs, who is listed as a recipient in Hansen’s will, took over as his power of attorney.

Darling was arraigned April 17 on a charge of embezzlement from a vulnerable adult, $20,000 or more, and bound over to circuit court in May. She is awaiting trial.

Mielock asked Jacobs in court Tuesday whether she’d ever acted as Hansen’s lawyer; whether she was a beneficiary of any of Hansen’s financial accounts or life insurance; whether she ever borrowed money from Hansen; whether she believed a conservator for Hansen would be responsible for recovering funds from her daughter, Mona Darling; whether she believed Darling took any assets from Hansen; and the extent of her involvement in at least two power of attorney documents drafted in regards to Hansen.

Jacobs responded to each question by asserting her Fifth Amendment right not to testify to avoid self-incrimination.

Jacobs declined to comment following the court hearing.

Probate court investigates Hansen relationship

Earlier in the hearing, Ingham County Probate Court Investigator Sarah Broschay told Garcia she met with Hansen at his Holt assisted living facility Monday, and she recommended Pat Gallagher be appointed Hansen’s conservator.

Broschay said Hansen is being held in a mental deficiency ward. Medical reports from 2014, included in the court record, indicate he has dementia.

“Mr. Hansen would engage in the conversation, but would often need to be reminded of my purpose for being there,” Broschay said in a report filed in probate court Tuesday. “Mr. Hansen seemed to know who Ms. Jacobs was, but did need to be reminded that she was his power of attorney.”

In her report, Broschay also voiced concerns about Jacobs’ oversight of Hansen’s assets because of Darling’s embezzlement charge and the belief that Jacobs limited Hansen’s access to family members over the past several years.

Jacobs stands to inherit about $1.5 million from Hansen's will, Broschay wrote in her report. Hansen’s will was drawn up by a U.S. Army major in 1992, according to documents contained in a police report related to Darling’s criminal case.

The police report also includes the February 2015 document naming Jacobs power of attorney. The document includes a section nominating and appointing Jacobs as guardian and/or conservator if the court orders one be appointed.

In the document, Mieke V. Weissert is named as Jacobs’ successor as power of attorney, guardian and conservator. Weissert is a lawyer at Loomis Law Firm, according to information on the firm’s website.

In court Tuesday, Dwyer said Jacobs had priority to become Hansen’s conservator since she was his power of attorney, but Garcia wasn’t in favor of the idea.

Full Article & Source:
Lansing lawyer who was removed from cases pleads the Fifth during hearing

See Also:
Judge requests investigation of Lansing lawyer, removes her from cases

Freed From Guardianship A Kentucky First: Suzie Wins Her Rights in Court Using SDM

$
0
0
Suzanne Heck wanted her rights back… and in the process the 22-year-old from Lexington became a pioneer and role model for those like her in Kentucky.

Shortly after Heck, who is diagnosed with a mild intellectual disability, reached adulthood, a Kentucky court took away her right to decide where she lived, what she did with her money and what happened to her body.

At the age of 18, she became a ward of the state.

So in March of 2017, Heck (her friends call her Suzie) and her support team contacted Kentucky Protection & Advocacy and requested its help with restoring her rights through Supported Decision-Making.

SDM is a way people can make their own decisions and stay in charge of their lives while receiving any help they need to do so. Supported Decision-Making is just a fancy way of describing how we all make choices.

Currently in Kentucky, there are over 4,500 adults in the state guardianship system, which is underfunded and severely overburdened.

Many adults like Heck can make decisions for themselves with the support of a team. Heck’s team consists of friends and paid caregivers through Kentucky’s intellectual and developmental disability Medicaid waiver called Supports for Community Living.

She attends day services at an Adult Day Training facility in Lexington, lives in a home with two housemates and staff who assist her with daily living, as needed.

When Camille Collins, an Advocate with Kentucky Protection & Advocacy, became involved in Heck’s case, Suzie’s supporters had already begun functioning as a SDM team.

Team member Stacy Seale, a licensed psychological associate at Employment Solutions, submitted a psychological report with a petition to modify or terminate guardianship in Fayette County District Court.

In this report, Seale emphasized all of Heck’s abilities and that she works with her team when making medical, personal and financial decisions.

“Ms. Heck does a wonderful job of seeking out her team and asking for their input on her current life decisions,” Seale said.

Seale concluded that Heck, working with her SDM team, would no longer need a legal guardian.
In April, Heck attended a hearing to modify or terminate her guardianship order. Her state guardian attended and agreed with Heck’s request.

Because the county attorney was not comfortable with the restoration, Collins requested that an attorney be appointed for Heck and that the hearing be postponed. The judge agreed.

Moria Mulligan, Heck’s appointed attorney, worked with Collins and Heck’s SDM team to learn how individuals with disabilities can use teams to support them in their ability to make decisions for themselves.

Heck also created a “Dream Board,” which consists of photos of her SDM team members on one side and illustrations that represent her hopes and dreams on the other.

Her goals are no different from anyone else’s – vacations, employment, and more time with family and friends.

As a ward of the state, most if not all of her goals and dreams would have to be approved by a guardian, forcing Heck to defend her goals.

That would mean meetings and hours of discussion. That was one of her motives for terminating guardianship.

On July 24, 2017 – two days before her birthday – the judge, with the agreement of the county attorney who better understood Heck’s situation, fully restored Heck’s rights. She is now able to make personal, medical and financial decisions.

Heck is a sort of Jackie Robinson for restored rights. She is the first person on record in Kentucky to have her rights fully restored by the courts with Supported Decision-Making as an alternative to guardianship.

Heck was so elated when the judge ruled in her favor, she nearly floated out of the courtroom.

“I was really nervous at first but when the judge ruled, I almost ran out because I was so excited. I was blown away,” she said.

Heck admits that the full impact of the ruling has yet to sink in, but she already has benefitted. Recently, she went with a friend and her friend’s caregiver to the Hamburg YMCA.

“As far as I can remember, that’s the first time I went out without a caregiver,” Heck said.

What else will she do with her freedom? “I want to buy a copy of the movie, ‘The Last Mimzy,’” she said.

Sounds simple enough. Not so if she were still a ward of the state. A request for cash would go though her guardian and then on to the state and could take a few weeks to process.

“Now, if she wants $50 to go to Kentucky Kingdom, for example, she can get the money the same day. She has total control of her money now,” Collins said.

“I’m excited for her. Research shows that people who are empowered with their rights live happier and healthier lives.”

Heck is bursting with plans for the future. In 2018, a visit Dollywood, and Disney World a year later.

She wants to be a social worker or a police officer or go to college. “How do I start applying for jobs?” she asks.

Chastity Ross, a former chairperson of the CCDD Council, is her case worker and can help with job searches or refer her to the Office of Vocational Rehabilitation.

In the meantime, Heck is heady with all the wild possibilities. “It’s awesome that I could go wherever I want and live wherever I want.”

Actually, her wishes are much more grounded – She longs for a family setting through the Family Home Provider program.

“I want to live with a family but why is it taking so long?”

Not to worry, said Collins. “I think you will find a family provider soon because you’re such an awesome person,” Collins said.

A big grin creases Heck’s face. There is much to be happy about now for Suzie Heck, a free woman with big dreams for the future.

The National Resource Center for Supported Decision-Making can help you find information on Supported Decision-Making and other alternatives to guardianship, access Supported Decision-Making agreements and other legal forms, connect you with people and organizations that may be able to help you, and answer your questions. Info: www. SupportedDecisionMaking.Org.

Full Article & Source:
Freed From Guardianship A Kentucky First: Suzie Wins Her Rights in Court Using SDM

Gary Ott dies after Alzheimer’s battle; former top aide blames his family

$
0
0

After years spent suffering from a progressive neurodegenerative disease, mostly hidden from public view, former longtime Salt Lake County Recorder Gary Ott died Thursday morning in hospice care in St. George.

He was 66.

Ott’s death followed a four-year struggle with Alzheimer’s disease. The details of his diagnosis were first made public last week in a court battle between Ott’s siblings and his former fiancee and assistant, Karmen Sanone.

A judge has yet to rule on who would become Ott’s guardian and conservator, which includes the power to preside over Ott’s estate. It’s not clear how his death will affect the court case. Third District Judge Bruce Lubeck said he planned to rule within days or weeks.

Martin Ott, Gary Ott’s brother, said his family spent several days at his side after being told Ott’s death was near. They were with him when he died, Martin Ott said.

“Believe me, the man was suffering. Every breath,” Martin Ott said.

Hours before his death, Sanone visited Ott’s facility and attempted to see him. The family and facility called St. George police and reported she was trespassing, according to a report read to The Tribune by Capt. Mike Giles.

“Family that were present as well as the facility had requested that she leave,” Giles said. “Our officers provided a trespass notice that if she returned charges could be filed or an arrest could be made.”

Attorneys in the case said they didn’t know what would happen moving forward with Ott’s estate, including a Salt Lake City home and banking and retirement accounts, along with immediate arrangements, such as services and interment.

Ott had been living with Sanone at her Weber County farm for years while maintaining legal residency in Salt Lake County.

The two acted like husband and wife, describing themselves as such to various doctors in recent years. They had exchanged rings and were once engaged, but never married.

After struggles with his speech, Ott saw a doctor in 2013 who said he believed the symptoms may indicate a form of dementia. Subsequent visits with neurologists confirmed Ott likely had Alzheimer’s. As of last week, Ott had advanced Alzheimer’s disease, attorneys said.

The diagnosis came two years after friends and former employees say they began seeing possible signs of the disease.

His decline would perplex friends, family and employees for years as they knew something was wrong with Ott but were powerless to remove him from office or otherwise intervene in his life.

His employees, meanwhile, attributed various symptoms emerging in public to a severe case of shingles and the medication he took for years to treat it. Two of his staffers, Sanone and former Chief Deputy Recorder Julie Dole, had access to his email account.

They said they never wrote anything purporting to be from Ott without his actually knowing and signing off on the correspondence. Sanone said she was writing his emails because a debilitating hand injury left him unable to write for himself. In one email, Sanone fretted over how to make an email appear as though it was coming from the elected recorder.

In another, sent May 5, 2016, between her public and private email addresses, Sanone sent a document called “Gary Ott Trust Outline,” a record obtained by The Tribune this week shows. The outline sought to give Sanone control over Ott’s trust.

“I want the trust designed such that all assets will remain in my control until such time as I become incapacitated or otherwise unable to make my own decisions,” the outline said. “At this time, the co-trustee will assume control of the trust and my assets.

“Karmen Sanone is to be named as Co-trustee.”

It’s not clear whether the outline, which sought to give Sanone control over all of Ott’s stocks and investments, powers of attorney, farm equipment and other assets, was ever signed.

In January 2015, the same day Ott was sworn into his final years in office, he purportedly signed an advance health care directive, a document nominating Sanone as his medical guardian should he need one in the future. Dole, who filled out much of the document, was also the legal witness.

He then walked into the county clerk’s office and stumbled over the oath of office, including repeating his own name.

After months of news reports that began to shed light on the apparent struggles of the county recorder, Ott’s family, living in southern Utah, asked the 3rd District Court to give them the power to make his medical and financial decisions.

After Sanone found out the siblings were going to court, she visited one of Ott’s financial planners and became the death beneficiary on one of his retirement accounts, according to court testimony.

Dole and Sanone have been accused of knowingly propping Ott up in the office for years while he suffered from his terminal condition, even going back to his 2014 re-election.

During that time, police were contacted about Ott at least three times, including one winter night in Tooele last year, when Ott ran out of gas and was wandering disoriented. Police, who described him as incoherent, took him to the emergency room.

His friends and family described a sense of relief on Thursday as Ott’s suffering came to an end, about 4 a.m. in hospice. Caretakers warned the family days ago that Ott was near death, and they spent several days with him.

“We’re religious people. We think that there’s a hereafter,” Martin Ott said. “Gary was crossing the line and would be joining with loved ones from long ago.”

In a written response, Dole said she was “deeply saddened” by the news. She said she learned of Ott’s condition in court last week and called accusations that she knew of his condition long ago “absurd.” She also blamed Ott’s siblings for his death.

“I believe from all reports that Gary met an untimely death due to his siblings‘ decisions, which I do not believe took any consideration of what Gary wanted, nor his quality of life,” Dole said. “He should have been allowed to spend his last days with his last days with his pets and life partner on the farm, not locked in a confined space.”

Salt Lake County District Attorney Sim Gill’s office has talked about an investigation related to the recorder’s office but has released no details of the matter.

Martin Ott said the family wants justice.

His friends and family described a sense of relief on Thursday as Ott’s suffering came to an end, about 4 a.m. in hospice. Caretakers warned the family days ago that Ott was near death, and they spent several days with him.

“We’re religious people. We think that there’s a hereafter,” Martin Ott said. “Gary was crossing the line and would be joining with loved ones from long ago.”

In a written response, Dole said she was “deeply saddened” by the news. She said she learned of Ott’s condition in court last week and called accusations that she knew of his condition long ago “absurd.” She also blamed Ott’s siblings for his death.

“I believe from all reports that Gary met an untimely death due to his siblings‘ decisions, which I do not believe took any consideration of what Gary wanted, nor his quality of life,” Dole said. “He should have been allowed to spend his last days with his pets and life partner on the farm, not locked in a confined space.”

Salt Lake County District Attorney Sim Gill’s office has talked about an investigation related to the recorder’s office but has released no details of the matter.

Martin Ott said the family wants justice.


“All of us, in the family, are very interested not in revenge here, there’s no [point] there. It’s a place for the cynical,” he said. “What we are interested in is justice. We’re hopeful that the folks that perpetrated what appear to us to be criminal acts are brought to justice.”

Full Article & Source:
Gary Ott dies after Alzheimer’s battle; former top aide blames his family

See Also:
Testimony: Gary Ott had dementia long before 2014 campaign

Judicial discipline panel recommends removal of chief judge

$
0
0
BALTIMORE (AP) — The Maryland panel that oversees judges’ conduct has recommended that Baltimore’s chief judge be removed from his position and not be permitted to serve as a judge in the state.

The Baltimore Sun reports the Commission on Judicial Disabilities unanimously voted that 69-year-old Chief Judge Alfred Nance committed “sanctionable conduct” and referred their recommendation to the Court of Appeals, which has the final say.

Nance was accused of having “persistently disrespectful” interactions with a public defender. The panel found that his tone of voice and body language were insensitive and inflammatory. Charges stemming from two other cases were dismissed for a “lack of proof.”

This is at least the third time the commission has publicly moved to discipline Nance.

Nance’s attorney couldn’t be reached for comment Wednesday.

Full Article & Source:
Judicial discipline panel recommends removal of chief judge

Deaths, injuries and nude photos - a list of 36 serious Pa. nursing home violations

$
0
0
(Click to Continue)

Full Article & Source:
Deaths, injuries and nude photos - a list of 36 serious Pa. nursing home violations

Column: With U.S. elder abuse in spotlight, a look at guardians

$
0
0
CHICAGO (Reuters) - Are unsuspecting seniors around the United States being scooped up without warning from their homes, placed in nursing homes and having their possessions taken away?

A pair of elderly couples view the ocean and waves along the beach in La Jolla, California March 8, 2012. REUTERS/Mike Blake
Sometimes, yes - according to a recent article in the New Yorker magazine. The investigation by journalist Rachel Aviv shines a light on problems in the Nevada courts that run the system of court-appointed guardians for the elderly (bit.ly/2xMBooc).

Aviv’s article paints a frightening portrait of a private guardian who was able to obtain a court order making her the guardian of a couple with no advance notice to them or to their adult daughter. They lost control of their lives - their assets were sold off and they were placed in a nursing home.

The abuses of private-guardian systems in some U.S. states have been on the radar screens of policy and legal experts for years, and Aviv’s story, “How the Elderly Lose Their Rights,” is worth reading in full.

When I circulated the article to readers recently, the questions started coming in about guardianship. How pervasive are the problems around the United States? Could this happen to me? What steps can I take to protect myself from this kind of abuse?

Good questions, all.

Guardianships are a legal relationship created by state courts that give one person the authority to make decisions in the best interest of someone judged to be incapacitated - and when no family member or friend is available to assume the role. In cases involving low-income people, a public guardian generally is appointed; private guardians are assigned when people have financial assets.

National data on older people placed into guardianship is very limited due to variations in the ways courts around the country track cases. But a 2010 report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) identified hundreds of allegations of abuse, neglect, and exploitation by guardians in 45 states and the District of Columbia between 1990 and 2010. The GAO reviewed 20 cases and found that guardians had stolen or otherwise improperly obtained $5.4 million from 158 incapacitated victims, mostly older adults.

PERVASIVE PROBLEM?

Is abuse by guardians common around the United States? “I don’t think it is pervasive, but it can happen anywhere in the country if courts or agencies are inattentive,” said Katherine Pearson, a professor at Pennsylvania State University’s Dickinson Law who specializes in elder law. “But the allegations (in the New Yorker article) are some of the worst that I’ve seen. There just was no critical scrutiny of people serving as guardians.”

Problems with abusive guardianship systems also have cropped up recently in Arizona, Florida and New Mexico, Pearson noted. Systematic reform will require commitment by the states to use more care in the selection, training and monitoring of guardians, she said.

Absent significant reforms, the math tells us the problem can only grow bigger as the country ages, and millions of baby boomers move into their 70s, 80s and 90s.

What is needed, Pearson argues, is more thoughtful oversight and accountability of guardians. And situations where the court becomes complacent about a single guardian or one guardianship organization can allow guardians to take hundreds of people under their wing.

“Where money is involved and incapacity are involved, there is always a risk of abuse if you don’t have checks and balances,” Pearson said.

Two legal requirements must be met before a court appoints a guardian. First, there must be a finding of incapacity. But there must also be a court decision that there is a need for a guardian - that is, no one has already been designated by the alleged incapacitated person to act as their agent or trustee before they became disabled.

How to protect yourself against possible abuses?

Be honest about the risks, and the need to plan in advance. Whenever possible execute legal power-of-attorney documents for your finances and healthcare.

In other words - have a succession plan, not just for inheritance, but for your care needs while you are still alive. The goal is to pick someone you trust to manage your affairs in the event you are unable to do so, either a family member or friend. Some elder law experts recommend bringing in a bank or trust company as professional trustee when they establish trusts for clients.

“In an ideal world, no one would need guardianship because you already have planned for your needs while recognizing the potential that you could need help,” Pearson said.

Full Article & Source:
Column: With U.S. elder abuse in spotlight, a look at guardians

Controversial East Bay judge charged with illegally doubling sentence

$
0
0
Judge Bruce C. Mills was charged with willful misconduct
MARTINEZ — A Contra Costa judge with a history of ethics violations was charged with judicial misconduct that could warrant his removal from the bench, records obtained Tuesday show.

The two counts of misconduct include allegations that Judge Bruce C. Mills illegally doubled the sentence of a judicial rights advocate who Mills had found to be in contempt of court. Mills jailed the man for discussing his divorce online, a decision that First Amendment experts called, “outrageous” and a free speech violation.

The two charges were filed Friday by the Commission on Judicial Performance, the California government body that investigates ethical complaints into judges. Mills is required to provide a written answer to the charges within 20 days.

Per the California Constitution, Mills faces removal or admonishment if the charges are found true. The CJP’s action carries no criminal penalties. Mills could not be reached for comment.

Mills, a judge since 1995, has been disciplined five times since 2001. He was admonished in 2013 after the commision found 10-0 that he had “created an appearance of impropriety that undermined public confidence in the impartiality and integrity of the judiciary” when he interfered with a case in which his son was a defendant. In 2001, he was found to have coerced a guilty plea out of a DUI defendant.

Last year, Mills sentenced San Ramon resident Joseph Sweeney to 25 days in jail for contempt, after finding that Sweeney’s online writings violated another judge’s restraining order not to disclose the contents of his ex-wife’s cellphone or computer. But Sweeney argued that his writings were sourced from publicly-available court documents filed by his ex-wife.

In the hearing, Mills claimed that “matters that are put into court pleadings and brought up in oral argument before the court do not become public thereby,” a statement several First Amendment experts say wildly misstates the nature of court records.

According to the hearing transcript, Mills also made it clear that Sweeney’s 25-day sentence — the maximum for five counts of contempt of court — qualified for 50 percent good time credits, meaning Sweeney would likely only serve half his sentence. Under state law, people convicted of nonviolent crimes are set free after serving half their sentences, assuming they have no disciplinary problems.

But days later, after Sweeney was in the West Contra Costa Jail, Mills allegedly directed a court clerk to modify the sentence and revoke Sweeney’s good time credits. The CJP alleges Mills did so without notifying the parties in the case or giving them time to respond, a violation of ethics guidelines.

When Sweeney found out his good time credits had been revoked, he contacted his attorney, Jim Morrison, from jail. In a 2016 interview, Morrison said he faxed the copy of the original order — which said Sweeney would serve 50 percent time — to the sheriff and to Mills. Sweeney’s good time credits were reinstated later that day, Morrison said.

Ironically, Sweeney is a well-known judicial reform advocate who has publicly criticized the commission’s handling of judicial misconduct cases. He testified in front of the state legislature last year, calling for a state audit of the CJP. Mills jailed Sweeney two days after the legislature approved the audit.

“Finally, (the CJP) feels pressured to be doing something about judicial misconduct, which is a good indication,” Sweeney said in an interview Tuesday when asked for a response to the action against Mills.

After his release from jail, Sweeney filed multiple complaints against Mills and appealed the judge’s decision. Last November he received a response from then-presiding Judge Steve Austin, who said that altering the order was improper, but suggested that Mills simply didn’t know he’d violated a rule.

“I view this as a training issue and not as something more serious as you have described it in your letter,” Austin wrote. “I have taken appropriate corrective action.”

Similarly, the Contra Costa District Attorney’s Office reviewed the matter and determined Mills hadn’t committed a crime, chief deputy Doug MacMaster wrote in a letter to Sweeney last year.

The second misconduct charge alleges Mills had a courtroom conversation with the prosecutor in a DUI case Mills was presiding over, where the two discussed the case. During the conversation, Mills compared the case to one he handled as a prosecutor and suggested that someone may have to look into whether breathalyzer systems were faulty.

“You did not disclose on the record your conversation with (the prosecutor) or recuse yourself from further proceedings in the case until April 1, 2016, after the district attorney’s office disclosed the ex parte conversation to a supervising judge and to defense counsel,” CJP Chairperson Hon. Ignazio Ruvolo wrote in the charging records.

Full Article & Source:
Controversial East Bay judge charged with illegally doubling sentence

Gravelle changes name, fights for guardianship of elderly relative

$
0
0
NORWALK — A woman a Huron County jury found guilty of child endangerment in 2006 — the subject of news stories that went viral — is in a custody battle over her wealthy aunt with dementia, according to court records.

In 2005, police removed 11 adopted children from Sharen Gravelle and her husband Michael’s home. Authorities claimed the couple had kept the children in cages, but a caseworker and the Gravelles contended the children were kept in enclosures for their own protection.

They lost custody of their adopted children and both Sharen and Michael Gravelle served prison terms.

Sharen Gravelle was released from prison in 2011 after serving a two-year term.

She has since divorced her husband and changed her name to Sharen Curtis-Timperman.

A Cleveland news news station, WKYC-TV 3, reported that Stacy Hansford left her 93-year-old mother, Barbara, with Curtis-Timperman while her home was being renovated.

Curtis-Timperman then allegedly fled to Houston, Mo., with Babara Hansford, where she’s trying to get appointed her legal guardian.

Babara Hansford was married to Richard L. Hansford — a former vice president and dean of student services at the University of Akron.

After his death in 2015, she was diagnosed with dementia, according to the news report from TV-3. Stacy Hansford believes that Curtis-Timperman is taking advantage of her mother to get to her sizable wealth, WKYC reported.

Full Article & Source:
Gravelle changes name, fights for guardianship of elderly relative

Post’s guardianship coverage wins honor from Florida Bar

$
0
0
The Palm Beach Post’s 2016 series “Guardianships: A Broken Trust” took second place this month in the print division of the Florida Bar’s 62nd Annual Media Awards.

The stories, written and reported by Post staff writer John Pacenti, with research by Melanie Mena and editing by Holly Baltz, exposed the conflicts facing now-retired Palm Beach County Circuit Judge Martin Colin after his wife, Elizabeth Savitt, became a guardian.

The stories showed Colin’s wife took tens of thousands of dollars in fees from her senior ward’saccounts prior to approval by the court, which Savitt’s attorney, and only her attorney, claimed was allowed by statute. In one case, a judge ordered Savitt and her attorney to return nearly $30,000.

After publication in January 2016, the circuit’s chief judge, Jeffrey Col-bath, transferred Colin out of the probate division. He also transferred all of Savitt’s cases to a distant courthouse to eliminate the potential for conflict with friendly judges.

In October, Colbath handed down sweeping guardianship reforms, addressing specifically complaints against Savitt. He instituted a random appointment basis for professional guardians and an arduous registration system.

The stories received startling response from readers, leading to a number of families reaching out to the newspaper about abusive guardianships.

The judging panel consisted of two out-of-state journalists, two Florida lawyers with substantial experience in journalism and/or media law and one Florida educator of journalism or law.

First place went to the Sarasota Herald-Tribune’s “Bias on the Bench” series, which found judges throughout Florida sentence black defendants to harsher punishments than whites charged with the same crimes under similar circumstances.

The Post’s stories tied for second place with the Sun-Sentinel’s “Forsaken: Florida’s Broken Mental Health System.” The awards were given out Monday in a Tallahassee ceremony that include dareceptionwith Florida Supreme Court justices.

Full Article & Source:
Post’s guardianship coverage wins honor from Florida Bar

I-Team: Family court judge could face disciplinary action

$
0
0
Click to Watch Video
LAS VEGAS - Clark County Family Court Judge Rena Hughes could face disciplinary action. The Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline filed a formal statement of charges on Oct. 10.

Two counts stem from a court hearing that occurred last June. The I-Team obtained video from the hearing and reported on an interaction between Judge Hughes and a 12-year-old girl last November.

The child's parents were in a custody battle. Judge Hughes had ordered the mother of the child to bring her daughter to court. According to the formal statement of charges, Hughes ordered everyone to leave the courtroom except for the child and addressed the child alone with no parents or advocates present for nine minutes. Judge Hughes made the decision the child would go home with her father, instead of her mother.

Here is an excerpt from the video:

Girl: "Please no.... (crying). I want to be with my mama. Please. I don't want to be with him."
Judge Hughes: "I've made my decision. I've already told you that."

Girl: "I beg of you."

Judge Hughes: "You don't need to beg. I've made the decision for your best interest."

Girl: "How do you know my best interest? You don't know me."

Judge Hughes: Because I told you. "I'm a grown-up, and you're a child."

Girl: "Please, please, please, please, please."

Judge Hughes also threatened to lock up the child if she did not comply. The I-Team is not identifying the child.

Here's another excerpt from the hearing:

Judge Hughes: "If you have any difficulties, _______will go to Child Haven. It's not fun in Child Haven. In fact, they put you in a holding cell, just like it would be jail."

Child: "Can I please see my mama?"

Judge Hughes: "You already saw her."

Child: "You don't understand. I love her, and I'm gonna miss her. Please don't do this to me."

Judge Hughes is accused of abusing her power, breaking the law, and failing to be patient, dignified, and courteous to the child and her mother, along with also not giving them a chance to be heard.

The I-Team reached out to Judge Hughes for a comment.

"Her attorney, Bill Terry, said they intend to deny all of the allegations and proceed to a hearing."

Full Article & Source:
I-Team: Family court judge could face disciplinary action

25% of the state’s 1,200 long-term care centers have been cited for serious standard deficiencies

$
0
0
Illustration by Jason Stout
Back in July, news broke out of North Austin that a 90-year-old resident of a nursing home had accused one of its employees of abuse. The woman said that as punishment for wetting the bed, the employee would flip the disabled woman over and strike her repeatedly on her backside.

This was hardly an isolated incident. Just months before, the Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services told KXAN that it was investigating a gruesome video, recorded at another Austin nursing home, that depicted a patient, whose hand is covered with feces, getting her nose tickled with a feather being held by a nurse’s aide. The video was uploaded onto Snapchat, and showed the gleeful aide watching as the woman reached to scratch her face with her feces-covered hand.

Though Texas maintains a host of laws that pertain to nursing home care, the state has an equally long history of trouble doing right by its elderly citizens. In January, the AARP released a blistering report titled “Intolerable Care,” which paints DADS as a toothless regulatory system that allows bad actors to get away with hurting clients. “Texas nursing home quality is shamefully poor,” it reads. “As a result of this intolerable care, many residents of Texas nursing homes face unnecessary health and safety risks.”

Limits of the System


For at least one former nurse’s aide, this summer’s news did not come as any surprise. Ty, who requested we only report her first name, fearing professional repercussions, had no idea what awaited her at the Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Duval – the long-term care facility now under investigation for the Snapchat video – when she applied to work there last June. The center, located at 5301 W. Duval Rd. in Northwest Austin, was offering a class that would allow Ty to become a certified nursing assistant – a foothold into the medical industry, which she hoped could support her and her child.

But the Windsor program “wasn’t much of a class.” Ty said she and her classmates did some book work, but “for the most part they had us out on the floor working.” She describes the program as a working internship where students couldn’t physically handle any of the patients because they were trainees. But that standard went out the window, she said, when she was put on a floor with no other employees.

“I didn’t have a choice,” Ty recalled. “I had to change people. I had to help people. I had to bathe people. I had to do everything, because there was nobody else there to do it. So that was one thing that kind of threw up red flags for me. But I was like, ‘Hey, if this is what I’ve got to do to get this certification, then that’s what I’m going to do.'”

Ty continued to work at Windsor until last October, and through those five months witnessed a number of incidents that caused her alarm. In one case, a client accused one of her co-workers of abuse. Ty said she navigated through a charge nurse, the director of nursing, and others within her chain of command to report the issue, but “nothing happened.” In another, she witnessed a woman whose soiled briefs were simply covered up with a fresh pair. “Not only is this woman soaked, but she is soaked all the way through all of her legs,” she recounted telling a co-worker. “And she has on two briefs, both of which are oversized.

“Neither one of those briefs were the ones she was supposed to have on. But she was soaked through both briefs. When was the last time somebody changed her?”

Of the more than 1,200 long-term care centers in Texas, 306 have been cited with serious standard deficiencies.
 

Abuse In Our Backyard


The severe abuse at Windsor seems to be compounded by severe neglect. Ty said that nurses often ignored or dismissed her concerns about patients’ health. During one shift, she noticed that a client had red splotches and busted blisters on and around her chest, and thought she may have shingles. Ty alerted the nurse, who said she would check on the resident. But instead, she continued to play on her phone and gossip with her colleagues, who should have been on the floor. The nurse didn’t visit the resident until later on in the day. It turns out she did have shingles.

Nurses also tried to cover up allegations of maltreatment. Ty said the son of one resident filed a complaint against the nurses, claiming they repeatedly abused his father. The nurse in that case tried to twist the father’s words so that the term “abuse” would not be used to describe the incident – instead trying to coax the father into saying that they were “being too rough,” said Ty, who was in the room when the incident was reported.

Ty was dismissed from her job after getting into an argument with one of the head nurses. She said she declined to follow the nurse’s command to move one patient from her bed to a chair. That patient, who had bruises all over her body, complained to Ty that she was in pain after a worker twisted her back during a treatment session. The patient didn’t want to leave her bed, nor did she want pain medication. When Ty told the nurse, she dismissed her concern and sternly told her to take the woman out of the bed. Ty refused, standing up for her patient’s wishes.

“She was crying, literally sobbing [about] how bad she was hurting,” she recounted. It was the incident “that broke the camel’s back.” The nurse became angry and “blew up.” She and Ty went into the hallway, where they had an argument. The nurse found another worker to put the resident into a chair, where she eventually sat all day. The nurse had Ty taken off the schedule, and she was later suspended. Ty went back to work after a couple of weeks, but was let go under the pretense that she first had to pass her certified nursing assistant certification.

Ty reported the abuse she witnessed to corporate management, but said leadership never responded directly to her complaints. Instead, they gave her the runaround, forcing her to go back and forth between corporate and the center’s administration. “It doesn’t seem like they’re doing anything,” she said.

In March, state and federal officials investigated six months’ worth of complaints lodged against Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. The 206-bed facility was found in violation of four federal and four state health standards, according to the Texas Department of Health and Human Services. (Texas facilities on average incur only three.)

The violations align with Ty’s allegations. According to state and federal records, Windsor had failed to protect residents from abuse, maltreatment, and isolation, and neglected to provide compassionate and competent care. The North Austin nursing home also fell short protecting residents’ privacy and confidentiality. These health infractions were allegedly corrected this year, on April 17. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which manages the Nursing Home Compare rating system, ranks Windsor below average for quality of resident care, as well as for health safety. A CMS health inspection conducted in July cited the facility with nine deficiencies – four of which deal with mistreatment.

“There are explicit rights for residents, and these kinds of violations get directly at those rights,” said Amanda Fredriksen, associate state director of advocacy for AARP Texas. “Like the right to be free of abuse and exploitation, [or] the right to privacy.”

Neither Windsor nor its management company, Regency Integrated Health Ser­vices, responded to multiple requests for comment.

Intolerable Care

Annie Lynette Allen (Courtesy of Darla Culpepper)

The Irving-area nursing home Darla Culpepper took her mother to seemed like an excellent facility. A high turnover rate among the administrative staff and nursing directors did eventually lead to a discomforting lack of continuity in care, but Culpepper said she never thought her mother was in danger. Then, in December, Annie Lynette Allen suffered a stroke.

That was one of the things her mother’s doctor had told her she shouldn’t worry about. As long as Allen’s caretakers made sure to administer the anti-stroke medication according to doctor’s orders, she would remain stroke-free. It wasn’t until after her mother had her stroke that she checked again with Allen’s doctor, and found out that the medication had been discontinued without her knowledge. The family filed a report with the Irving police, and DADS eventually cited the home on Allen’s behalf. Culpepper said it took a substantial effort.

“I can’t remember if it was the third or fourth time that I called back, and I said, ‘I’m filing a new report, and I just want to tell you this: I’m not going away,'” said Culpepper. “‘Unless I die tomorrow, I’m not going away until you do something.'”

Statistics show that throughout the country, health-standard violations found in nursing homes are on the decline. But in Texas the number is spiking. According to TheDallas Morning News, cited deficiencies in Texas facilities rose by 20% between 2010 and 2014; severe infractions increased by 3% over that time. Over that same period, however, severe violations at nursing homes across the country declined by 16%.

Incidents of abuse, like what happened at Windsor, are not a new phenomenon in Texas. It’s part of a larger pattern of poor care that lands the state at the bottom of quality lists. In 2014, Families for Better Care, a nonprofit advocating for better nursing home care, ranked the state 51st out of 51 (including Washington, D.C.), and gave it an “F” grade. Texas stayed put the following year, according to the Houston Chronicle. And, as recently as August, found itself in third place for worst nursing home care – right behind New Mexico and Kentucky, according to ProPublica.

“There are very good nursing homes in Texas,” said Bastrop attorney David Bragg, a civil litigation attorney who specializes in nursing home and assisted living center abuse and neglect. “I’ve seen them firsthand; even way back in the dark days they were still there.

“A nursing home, even though it is excellent, can all of a sudden have a horrible night when two staff members call in sick, and suddenly they’re short of staff. And now they’ve got the same patient requirements but fewer people to do it with. And when that happens, even the really good nursing homes can have a bad night – a bad experience.”

Bragg has spent decades watchdogging the state’s nursing home industry. In the Seventies, when he headed the Attorney General’s Consumer Protection Division, Bragg was directed by Attorney General John Hill to start a task force to investigate reports of nursing home abuse in the state.

At the time, the nursing home lobby was one of the more powerful lobbying arms within the state. Bragg’s 20-member task force, made up of attorneys, a social worker, and other investigators, set about its task by going from nursing home to nursing home. Bragg recalls bringing a toy blow gun from his house into the office: He would shoot a dart from the gun at a map of the state that he’d positioned on a wall. Wherever the dart landed, the group would conduct surprise inspections of the facilities in that area.

“After the task force had done its work, you could see some improvement in this sense: If bad things were continuing to happen, they were better concealed and not so obvious,” he said. “We know we were able to stop some bad things from happening, but then it ended. Over time, the industry … went to its prior ways.”  (Click to Continue)

Full Article & Source:
25% of the state’s 1,200 long-term care centers have been cited for serious standard deficiencies

Family in dispute over care of woman with brain damage

$
0
0
Court told by partner and daughters that Mrs P would want to die in such circumstances, while sisters want artificial feed to continue

A family is in dispute over the ongoing care of a woman with brain damage who had suggested she would want to die in such circumstances, a court has heard.

The woman, identified as Mrs P, is said to be in a “minimally conscious state” on an acute hospital ward following a fall last year. A Court of Protection judge is being asked to consider whether she should continue to receive clinically assisted nutrition and hydration.

The woman’s daughters and her partner consider it would not be in her best interests and that she should be provided with palliative care. But her sisters disagree and say an artificial feed should be maintained to see whether she might improve.

A judge in Preston was told on Monday of an email that Mrs P sent to one of her daughters more than three-and-a-half years before her fall.

It read: “Did you see that thing on dementia? Made me think of dad and what a travesty of life his last years were all the sadder as he had such an incredible talent.

“You know I miss Mum everyday and still talk to her but it is a comfort that she went quickly and I’m still haunted by how he ended up ... Get the pillow ready If I get that way?”

However, her sisters insist their sibling would want the opportunity to potentially get better. One sister thought the withdrawal of feeding would be a form of “legalised killing”, the court heard, while another said the medical profession should be the judge of what treatment is provided.

The NHS foundation trust that is treating Mrs P, which cannot be identified, has applied to the court to continue providing clinical treatment and transfer her to a specialist nursing home.

Joseph O’Brien, for the trust, told the judge, Mr Justice Hayden: “Very early on, Mrs P’s daughters were expressing the view to the clinicians that she would not wish to have any treatment which would continue her existence, her life, if she in fact was suffering from brain damage.”

He said witness evidence from friends and neighbours, with recollections of specific conversations, would also set out what Mrs P would wish to happen to her “in the event she found herself either with dementia or with any cognitive problems”.

But he added: “There is a strong presumption about the preservation of life.

“On the evidence we’ve seen so far there is nothing that’s strong enough to rebut the notion that in the circumstances she currently finds herself, she would wish treatment to be discontinued.”

Two medical experts who examined Mrs P’s case agreed there would be no further change in her underlying neurological and neurophysiological state.

They also agreed there would be no significant improvement in underlying levels of awareness and responsiveness.

But they had different opinions on whether nutrition and hydration should continue. One said she believed there was a reasonable prospect that in a different environment Mrs P would become more interactive with other people, and that Mrs P did at times show pleasure and engage with therapy, nursing and medical staff.

But the other expert felt that Mrs P showed evidence of distress and not wishing to engage socially, at least from time to time. He did not agree that there would be a marked improvement in Mrs P’s level of social engagement and quality of life in a different setting.

The three-day hearing continues on Tuesday.

Full Article & Source:
Family in dispute over care of woman with brain damage

Attorney for judge facing misconduct fires back at California commission

$
0
0
MARTINEZ — The attorney for a Contra Costa judge who’s facing misconduct charges for the sixth time fired back against the state Commission on Judicial Performance with accusations of his own.

According to attorney Jim Murphy, who is defending Superior Court Judge Bruce C. Mills against two counts of misconduct, the CJP — the California body that investigates and disciplines judges — should have recused itself when it received a complaint against Mills from San Ramon resident Joseph Sweeney, who is an outspoken critic of the commission.

“Sweeney has attacked and challenged the commission on several fronts… I think if any judge was put into CJP’s position, that judge is disqualified,” Murphy said. “That judge can’t investigate this complaint, make a determination, or order formal proceedings, which this commission has done.”
A CJP spokeswoman declined to comment on Murphy’s remarks.

Mills is facing two counts of misconduct. The first alleges that he had an improper courtroom conversation with a prosecutor about the DUI case they were handling, and the second alleges that he attempted to illegally double Sweeney’s sentence for contempt of court in a civil case.

Sweeney, the founder of an advocacy group called Court Reform LLC, became interested in legal reform while representing himself in a messy divorce case and growing disenchanted with the legal system. He issued a report criticizing the CJP for failing to adequately investigate judicial misconduct, prompting the commission to issue a response.

Last year, Mills sentenced Sweeney to 25 days in jail— the maximum for five counts of contempt — after finding Sweeney had violated another judge’s order not to disclose the contents of his wife’s cell phone. Sweeney published a blog that was sourced from public court records filed by his ex-wife, but contained a lot of the same information he’d originally gleaned from her phone.

While Sweeney was serving his sentence, Mills directed his clerk to modify the order, revoking the good behavior credits, and fax a copy of it to the jail. But he failed to notify either party in the case, according to the CJP. The CJP says he violated seven cannons from the Judicial Code of Ethics in his handling of the Sweeney case.

In California, nonviolent offenders who are sentenced to more than four days in jail are granted one day off their sentence for every day they go without discipline, effectively cutting most sentences in half. Murphy said Mills was confused about whether that applied to civil contempt sentences, which Murphy called “quasi-criminal” in nature.

In the August 2016 hearing, Mills said twice on the record that Sweeney was entitled to good time credits.

“Well, keep in mind, he’s also going to get good time credits,” Mills said, according to the transcript. He added, “So out of 25, he’ll serve 12 or 13?”

According to the transcript a bailiff responded, “Yes,” and Mills said, “So the reality is he’ll only serve half of it to begin with.”

After the hearing, though, Mills’ clerk inquired whether good time credits actually applied. The judge researched it and determined that they did not, Murphy said.

After the order was modified, Sweeney’s lawyer got involved. He faxed Mills and the sheriff a copy of the original order — which didn’t have the  added note revoking good time credits — Mills reinstated the good time credits. Murphy said the judge did that to “Avoid the fight and further appeals and riffs in dealing with someone who has proved himself to be litigious,” referencing Sweeney.

“You’re talking about 13 versus 25 days,” Murphy said. “I think it was, ‘Let’s just give him the time served.'”

Mills has been disciplined five times by the CJP, most recently in 2013, when he was admonished for interfering with a case in which his son was a defendant.

Full Article & Source:
Attorney for judge facing misconduct fires back at California commission
Viewing all 12001 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images